Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment software tools through a wind turbine case study

Autor: Blanco Fernández, JulioSáenz-Díez Muro, Juan CarlosMartínez Cámara, EduardoSanz Adán, FélixJiménez Macías, Emilio

Tipo de documento: Artículo de revista

Revista: Renewable Energy. ISSN: 0960-1481. Año: 2015. Volumen: 74 (2015). Páginas: 237-246.

Texto completo open access 

JCR (datos correspondientes al año 2014):
Edición:
Science  Área: ENERGY & FUELS  Quartil: Q1  Lugar área: 20/88  F. impacto: 3,476 

SCIMAGO (datos correspondientes al año 2014):
SJR:
1,962  SNIP: 2,565 

CIRC: GRUPO A

Referencias:

  • Lemoine, D.M., Fuss, S., Szolgayova, J., Obersteiner, M., Kammen, D.M., The influence of negative emission technologies and technology policies on the optimal climate mitigation portfolio (2012) Clim Change, 113 (2), pp. 141-162
  • Kunkel, C.M., Kammen, D.M., Design and implementation of carbon cap and dividend policies (2011) Energy Policy, 39 (1), pp. 477-486
  • Sanderson, B.M., O'Neill, B.C., Kiehl, J.T., Meehl, G.A., Knutti, R., Washington, W.M., The response of the climate system to very high greenhouse gas emission scenarios (2011) Environ Res Lett, 6 (3). , art. no. 034005
  • Ferguson, G., Subsurface energy footprints (2013) Environ Res Lett, 8 (1). , art. no. 014037
  • Cherubini, F., Bright, R.M., Strømman, A.H., Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure? (2013) Environ Res Lett, 8 (1). , art. no. 014049
  • Barba-Gutiérrez, Y., Adenso-Díaz, B., Lozano, S., Eco-efficiency of electric and electronic appliances: a data envelopment analysis (DEA) (2009) Environ Model Assess, 14 (4), pp. 439-447
  • Bravo, Y., Carvalho, M., Serra, L.M., Monné, C., Alonso, S., Moreno, F., Environmental evaluation of dish-Stirling technology for power generation (2012) Sol Energy, 86 (9), pp. 2811-2825
  • Chester, M., Pincetl, S., Elizabeth, Z., Eisenstein, W., Matute, J., Infrastructure and automobile shifts: positioning transit to reduce life-cycle environmental impacts for urban sustainability goals (2013) Environ Res Lett, 8 (1). , art. no. 015041
  • Coventry, Z.A., Tize, R., Karunanithi, A., Environmental life-cycle assessment of waste-to-energy technologies (2012) Air and Waste Management Association - International Conference on Thermal Treatment Technologies and Hazardous Waste Combustors, pp. 159-174
  • Desideri, U., Zepparelli, F., Morettini, V., Garroni, E., Comparative analysis of concentrating solar power and photovoltaic technologies: technical and environmental evaluations (2013) Appl Energy, 102, pp. 765-784
  • Dufour, J., Serrano, D.P., Gálvez, J.L., Moreno, J., García, C., Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions (2009) Int J Hydrogen Energy, 34 (3), pp. 1370-1376
  • Esteban, B., Baquero, G., Puig, R., Riba, J.R., Rius, A., Is it environmentally advantageous to use vegetable oil directly as biofuel instead of converting it to biodiesel? (2011) Biomass Bioenergy, 35 (3), pp. 1317-1328
  • Gebreslassie, B.H., Slivinsky, M., Wang, B., You, F., Life cycle optimization for sustainable design and operations of hydrocarbon biorefinery via fast pyrolysis, hydrotreating and hydrocracking (2013) Comput Chem Eng, 50, pp. 71-91. , Original Research Article
  • González-García, S., Mola-Yudego, B., Dimitriou, I., Aronsson, P., Murphy, R., Environmental assessment of energy production based on long term commercial willow plantations in Sweden (2012) Sci Total Environ, pp. 210-219
  • Hajjaji, N., Pons, M.N., Renaudin, V., Houas, A., Comparative life cycle assessment of eight alternatives for hydrogen production from renewable and fossil feedstock (2013) JClean Prod, 44, pp. 177-189
  • Martínez-González, A., Casas-Leuro, O.M., Acero-Reyes, J.R., Castillo-Monroy, E.F., Comparison of potential environmental impacts on the production and use of high and low sulfur regular diesel by life cycle assessment (2011) CTyF Cienc Tecnol Futuro, 4 (4), pp. 123-136
  • Martínez, E., Sanz, F., Pellegrini, S., Jiménez, E., Blanco, J., Life-cycle assessment of a 2-MW rated power wind turbine: CML method (2009) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 14 (1), pp. 52-63
  • Martínez, E., Sanz, F., Pellegrini, S., Jiménez, E., Blanco, J., Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine (2009) Renew Energy, 34 (3), pp. 667-673
  • Miller, V.B., Landis, A.E., Schaefer, L.A., Abenchmark for life cycle air emissions and life cycle impact assessment of hydrokinetic energy extraction using life cycle assessment (2011) Renew Energy, 36 (3), pp. 1040-1046
  • Modahl, I.S., Askham, C., Lyng, K.A., Brekke, A., Weighting of environmental trade-offs in CCS - an LCA case study of electricity from a fossil gas power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture, transport and storage (2012) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 17 (7), pp. 932-943
  • Nishimura, A., Hayashi, Y., Tanaka, K., Hirota, M., Kato, S., Ito, M., Life cycle assessment and evaluation of energy payback time on high-concentration photovoltaic power generation system (2010) Appl Energy, 87 (9), pp. 2797-2807
  • Pawelzik, P.F., Zhang, Q., Evaluation of environmental impacts of cellulosic ethanol using life cycle assessment with technological advances over time (2012) Biomass Bioenergy, 40, pp. 162-173
  • Pérez-Fortes, M., Bojarski, A.D., Puigjaner, L., Co-production of electricity and hydrogen from coal and biomass gasification (2011) Chem Eng Trans, 25, pp. 507-512
  • Talens Peiró, L., Lombardi, L., Villalba Méndez, G., Gabarrell i Durany, X., Life cycle assessment (LCA) and exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA) of the production of biodiesel from used cooking oil (UCO) (2010) Energy, 35 (2), pp. 889-893
  • Torres, C.M., Ríos, S.D., Torras, C., Salvadó, J., Mateo-Sanz, J.M., Jiménez, L., Sustainability analysis of biodiesel production from Cynara Cardunculus crop (2013) Fuel, 111, pp. 535-542
  • Wang, B., Gebreslassie, B.H., You, F., Sustainable design and synthesis of hydrocarbon biorefinery via gasification pathway: integrated life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis with multiobjective superstructure optimization (2013) Comput Chem Eng, 52, pp. 55-76
  • Brent, A.C., Hietkamp, S., Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment methods with a South African case study (2003) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 8 (1), pp. 27-38
  • Bovea, M.D., Gallardo, A., The influence of impact assessment methods on materials selection for eco-design (2006) Mater Des, 27 (3), pp. 209-215
  • Cavalett, O., Chagas, M.F., Seabra, J.E.A., Bonomi, A., Comparative LCA of ethanol versus gasoline in Brazil using different LCIA methods (2012) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 18, pp. 647-658
  • Carvalho, I.S., Antão, P., Soares, C.G., Modelling of environmental impacts of ship dismantling (2011) Ships Offshore Struct, 6 (1-2), pp. 161-173
  • Dreyer, L.C., Niemann, A.L., Hauschild, M.Z., Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99: does it matter which one you choose (2003) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 8 (4), pp. 191-200
  • Fantozzi, F., Buratti, C., Life cycle assessment of biomass chains: wood pellet from short rotation coppice using data measured on a real plant (2010) Biomass Bioenergy, 34 (12), pp. 1796-1804
  • Knoeri, C., Sanyé-Mengual, E., Althaus, H.J., Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications (2013) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 18, pp. 909-918
  • Monteiro, H., Freire, F., Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: comparison of three impact assessment methods (2012) Energy Build, 47, pp. 572-583
  • Pant, R., Van Hoof, G., Schowanek, D., Feijtel, T.C.J., De Koning, A., Hauschild, M., Comparison between three different LCIA methods for aquatic ecotoxicity and a product environmental risk assessment: insights from a detergent case study within OMNIITOX (2004) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 9 (5), pp. 295-306
  • Renou, S., Thomas, J.S., Aoustin, E., Pons, M.N., Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA (2008) JClean Prod, 16 (10), pp. 1098-1105
  • Simões, C.L., Xará, S.M., Bernardo, C.A., Influence of the impact assessment method on the conclusions of a LCA study. Application to the case of a part made with virgin and recycled HDP (2011) Waste Manage Res, 29 (10), pp. 1018-1026
  • Valderrama, C., Granados, R., Cortina, J.L., Gasol, C.M., Guillem, M., Josa, A., Comparative LCA of sewage sludge valorisation as both fuel and raw material substitute in clinker production (2013) JClean Prod, 51, pp. 205-213
  • Van Caneghem, J., Block, C., Vandecasteele, C., Assessment of the impact on human health of industrial emissions to air: does the result depend on the applied method? (2010) JHazard Mater, 184 (1-3), pp. 788-797
  • Van Caneghem, J., Vermeulen, I., Block, C., Cramm, P., Mortier, R., Vandecasteele, C., Abiotic depletion due to resource consumption in a steelwork assessed by five different methods (2010) Resour Conserv Recycl, 54 (12), pp. 1067-1073
  • Davidsson, S., Höök, M., Wall, G., Areview of life cycle assessments on wind energy systems (2012) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 17 (6), pp. 729-742
  • (2001) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO Standards
  • LCA in perspective
  • guide
  • operational annex to guide, , Centre for Environmental Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands, J.B. Guinée (Ed.)
  • Goedkoop, M., Effting, S., Collignon, M., (2000) The eco-indicator 99 - a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Manual for designers, , 17-4-2000, PRé Consultants B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands
  • Brand, G., Braunschweig, A., Sche idegger, A., Schwank, O., (1998) Ecopoints 97 (CH) V2.03/Ecopoints (Bewertung in Oekobilanzen mit der Methode der ökologischen Kn appheit Oekofaktoren 1997), , BUWAL Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 297, BUWAL, Bern
  • Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M., Airing, L., EDIP/UMIP 97 V2.03/EDIP World/Dk: environmental assessment of products (1997) Methodology, tools and case studies in product development, 1. , Chapman &
  • Hall, United Kingdom, Kluwer Academic Publishers
  • Hingham, MA, USA
  • Steen, B., (1999) EPS a systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000 - general system characteristics, , CPM Report 1999:4, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology (2003) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 8 (6), pp. 324-330
  • Bare, J.C., Norris, G.A., Pennington, D.W., McKane, T., TRACI: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts (2003) JInd Ecol, 6 (3-4), pp. 49-78
  • Frischknecht, R., Rebitzer, G., The Ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database (2005) JClean Prod, 13 (13-14), pp. 1337-1343
  • Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H.-J., Doka, G., Dones, R., Heck, T., The Ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework (2005) Int J Life Cycle Assess, 10 (1), pp. 3-9